Canonum De Ius Positivum
Canons of Positive Law

one heaven iconIV.   Consensus

4.3 Consensus Obligation

Article 130 - Remedy

Canon 2295 (link)

Remedy is a fictional concept in Reality whereby an Injured Party receives a form of cure, repair, correction, compensation and justice against an Injury in accordance with these canons and any valid statutes promulgated by valid Juridic Persons.

Canon 2296 (link)

The damage, loss, violation or hurt to a physical object or concept under Natural Law itself does not automatically warrant Remedy as Remedy requires the pre-existence of a fictional framework under Positive Law prohibiting certain Actions, an Injured Form, an Accused Form and a lawful Ordinance against the Accused.

Canon 2297 (link)

All Positive Law is by definition imperfect as it is made by men and women. Therefore, all Positive Law requires Remedy to offset its imperfect nature.

Canon 2298 (link)

Failure to make public, easily obtainable, clear and concise the existence of Remedy and how it may be exercised is the same as if no valid Remedy exists at all.

Canon 2299 (link)

The deliberate use of obscure or multiple meaning terms or the failure to express in simple language the function and process of a particular Remedy is the same as if no valid Remedy exists at all.

Canon 2300 (link)

The absence of valid Remedy as part of any Positive Law negates its validity and renders such a law null and void from the beginning.

Canon 2301 (link)

All Consensus requires valid Remedy. Therefore, the absence of valid Remedy negates the validity and enforceability of the particular Consensus.

Canon 2302 (link)

Any Decree, Prescript, Rescript or Ordinance that is not in accordance with these Canons concerning Remedy is not a valid Statute, nor law but a false edict and therefore null and void from the beginning.