Canonum De Ius Cogitatum
Canons of Cognitive Law

one heaven iconV.   Mind Influence (PSYTELL)

5.2 Mind Influence System

Article 141 - Judgment

Canon 1395 (link)

Judgmentis a term used to define the decision, order or sentence of a court concerninga person that binds the mind and flesh to it through consent.

Canon 1396 (link)

Theterm Judgment was first invented at the Jesuit College of English in the late16th Century then delivered through the guise of the Shakespeare portfolio aspart of the introduction of the world’s first Mind Influence System that eventuallyreplaced physical slavery with (voluntary) slavery of the mind. The wordJudgment is derived from two Latin words iug(o) meaning “to bind together,connect, couple (together)” and ment(is) meaningMind”. Hence the true originalmeaning of the word Judgment is “to bind together the mind (and person)”.

Canon 1397 (link)

Bydefinition, when a mind, demonstrating competence and honor refuses consent tobe bound to the conditions of a decision, order or sentence, then a Judgmentdoes not stand, even if the man or woman is forcibly taken into imprisonment ortheir possessions seized. Upon appeal, such a Judgment must be rendered invalidand reparations made.

Canon 1398 (link)

Bydefinition, when a mind, demonstrating competence and honor refuses consent tobe bound to the conditions of a decision, order or sentence, then the judge ormagistrate is obligated to pay and perform the liability associated with anyperformance bond attached to the matter as the Judgment does not stand. Uponappeal, such a Judgment must be rendered invalid and the liability for any bondmust be paid by the original judge or magistrate.